May 19 2009

How Will Wolfram Alpha Enable Users to Create Value?

I’ve been messing around with Wolfram|Alpha and I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s essentially a computer driven version of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia’s major advantage is that its users create value by editing, creating, and improving content.  Essentially, Wikipedia gives its users a platform to create value.  This is one of the basic principles of success in the Web 2.0 era.  Basically, you’re getting your users to do your work for free.

For example, Flickr users create value by tagging photos with relevant metadata which allows for searching and marketing activities.  A photo of the Eiffel tower may be tagged with words like “Paris”, “France”, “Eiffel Tower”, etc.  This allows users to quickly find that photo via search or browsing and allows marketers to target specific keywords and photos.  Traditional stock photography companies spend huge amount of money on employing people to tag their photo collections. Think of the costs that Flickr is saving.

Currently, the data that drives Wolfram|Alpha is combined and curated by the Wolfram|Alpha team.  These are internalized costs.  Basically, it’s the Wolfram|Alpha team that is creating value.  The resources it would require to turn Wolfram|Alpha into a truly useful tool are just too much for one company to bear with internal staff.  In the Web 2.0 universe, users create value and platforms that don’t allow users to do this face an uphill battle.

May 11 2009

Wolfram Alpha Buzz Continues to Grow

The buzz surrounding ‘answer-engine’ Wolfram Alpha continues to grow leading up to its late May release date. How is Wolfram Alpha different from Google search? In order to answer questions using Google’s search you would type in your topic and drill down into the documents or web pages on the results page that might contain the answer. On the other hand, Wolfram Alpha allows you to ask a question directly and serves up the answer right on the results page. For example, searching on “the population of Finland” would result in demographics information gathered by Wolfram Alpha from various data sources and aggregated together on the results page.

Even if Wolfram Alpha ends up failing it’s sure to have an influence on the future of search. Google has definitely taken note although I’m sure they’re not worried about Wolfram Alpha having a negative impact on their business. Rather than a Google killer, Wolfram Alpha is a different kind of search and may find a nice niche in academia.

For more information read ZDNet’s article entitled “Deep inside Wolfram Alpha”